thefourthvine: Two people fucking, rearview: sex is the universal fandom. (Default)
Keep Hoping Machine Running ([personal profile] thefourthvine) wrote2009-12-11 11:27 am
Entry tags:

[Poll] The fannish baby boom.

Okay, first, I want to thank everyone for the snowflake cookies. It was awesomely fun, particularly as that's the only snowfall we'll be seeing this year. (I know, I know, everyone who is currently buried in snow is saying, "Oh, my heart bleeds for you." Let me keep my snow fantasies, people!) Also, um, it turns out there's a setting you can have turned on that notifies you when someone you have friended gets a virtual gift. I totally did not know that. And a lot of you got snowflakes. A lot. That comment notification lockup? That was probably partly my fault. I'm still getting backed-up notices about snowflakes.

...I'll fix that setting now.

But that is unrelated to the subject of this poll. Allow me to make a sharp left turn, here.

I'm curious about the fannish baby boom. As in, is it real? Unfortunately, I can't go back in time and run this poll on fans ten years ago, but I can at least be nosy today, and that's good enough for me. Tell me about your next generation!

[Poll #1497731]
ext_1310: (gift)

[identity profile] musesfool.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 07:37 pm (UTC)(link)
I would bet that fans are probably having the same number - or fewer - babies now as ten years ago, but ten years ago, we were mostly on mailing lists, and so wouldn't have discussed it as regularly etc. So it just seems like more, because people post about it to their LJs instead of leaving it for private mail or off-topic list posts.
ext_2366: (duesouth: puffin face)

[identity profile] sdwolfpup.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 07:40 pm (UTC)(link)
My fannish circle seems to be having more children since I started LJ in 2003, but my fannish circle is also quite a bit larger than it was. This sure seemed like the year for babies amongst friends and acquaintances, though.

Also, we THINK we want another one, but we want to get through the first two years with this one first before we decide. *g*
ext_2454: (Default)

[identity profile] ninasis.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 07:47 pm (UTC)(link)
I said I have 2 and am expecting, but that might seem misleading since the one that I'm expecting will make #2. But since that's a week away I'm counting him as fully cooked. :)

[identity profile] cathalin.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 08:01 pm (UTC)(link)
I almost wasn't going to fill this in for time reasons, but saw "have three children" at Zero and just had to, because I like being different or something? *such a ~rebel* (and also because there are too many sane people responding, and obviously you needed someone insane, aka someone with more than two children).

I answered that it seems like more are having kids, but thinking back, I'm not sure if that's true, or it's just that lj brings out the talk about that kind of thing more. Yeah, you know what, I'm thinking it's the latter and maybe my vote should have been "it's the same as always."

If I haven't said recently, I love your musings/polls/recs/side-splittingly funny thoughts/child postings.<333
Edited 2009-12-11 20:03 (UTC)

[identity profile] redhedlvr.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 08:07 pm (UTC)(link)
You need a ticky for grandkids!
ext_2569: text: "a straight account is difficult, so let me define seven wishes" image: man on steps. (Default)

[identity profile] labellementeuse.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 08:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Seems that way to me... but I became fannish when I was around 14, and I'm now 22. So it's not a totally whacky proposition that my circle of fandom, which has usually been within spitting distance of my own age on the whole, would be having more babies now than 8 years ago, without necessarily changing the dynamics of fannish baby-having as a whole.

[identity profile] suchthefangirl.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 08:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I bet I'm as much to blame as you are for the backlog, I forgot about that feature as well, and it took days for me to be told about all the people that were getting cookies!

I'm old and my kids are old (both in high school this year) but they are not alone. I know lots and lots of people in fandom on both sides of the tables and it seems to me that at a certain age, people start having kids. Or they don't. As you get older, there are more people around with kids. As the fans age they might take some time off to be a parent, but then they are back again when they have more free time. And then their kids get involved. I've seen generations. (my kids might not like Man from UNCLE, due South, or Sports Night, but one is obsessed with Veronica Mars, Buffy and Pushing Daisies, etc.; and the other is equally passionate about Avatar The Last Airbender, Inuyasha and Death Note, etc. It goes on)

[identity profile] merryish.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 08:17 pm (UTC)(link)
I think there's something in the water!

[identity profile] claire.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 08:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, I have half a child, since he's still percolating. When I say I'm fine with the number of kids I have, I mean one though. I am assuming here that he will fully cook and come out of the oven as 1 person rather than half a person.

[identity profile] terriaminute.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 08:27 pm (UTC)(link)
I waited until my 40th year to have mine (great pregnancy) because it takes awhile sometimes for all parties concerned to be grown up enough for a kid. LOL

I know many much younger people who are childfree by choice. Totally fine with me. I would far rather they actively decide than bring an unwanted child into this crowded world. (Every last one would make a great parent, of course. It's the ones who thoughtlessly procreate who, IMHO, really ought not to have.)

[identity profile] sprat.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 08:33 pm (UTC)(link)
I got mine a year ago, but he came partially grown. So...I am only sort of part of the fannish baby boom? (Which really does seem to exist, to me -- there's been a boom on my flist lately, anyway.)

[identity profile] vsee.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)
I've never been interested in having my own children, but I've always rather liked them, and I enjoy having kids in my life. I find it hard as a single woman with no kids to make real life friends with other women my own age (i.e.major childbearing and raising years). Women in marriage/partnerships who have kids always seem to jump to the conclusion that I don't get it or don't like kids.

[identity profile] apetslife.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 08:42 pm (UTC)(link)
*points up* What she said!

[identity profile] malnpudl.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 08:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Heh. I've always been the person who visits the household with the new baby and lavishes attention on the dog. Hey, somebody's got to do it, right? *g*

Though I am convinced that the Earthling would trump even cute canines. He has superpowers.

Re the question at hand: It seems to go in waves. People I "met" online as young twenty-somethings are now closer to thirty, so it makes sense that some of them would be doing the babies thing. And so on...

[identity profile] giddygeek.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 08:49 pm (UTC)(link)
It makes me happy to see so many responses to the last question at the 3 or 4 mark. And the 5, too, but I assume those are people who got really really good news today. *grins*

[identity profile] anoel.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 08:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Right now I definitely don't want kids for the next ten years or so. But I'm leaving the end decision up to my partner, if he or she wants kids, I'm fine with having ONE (and only one) and if not, zero is fine too. Because I'm pretty cool either way. at least right now.

I don't know about the old days of fandom but from 2003-2008 I didn't know anyone on LJ who was having a child and this year I know four. So it seems like there's a current baby boom to me.
busaikko: Something Wicked This Way Comes (Default)

[personal profile] busaikko 2009-12-11 09:05 pm (UTC)(link)
And because I think it's relevant, I'm 38 years old. Statistically, I would expect that you'd find fewer fans under 20 and over 40 having kids (um... yeah) and probably most of them in their late 20s/30s (because so many people seem to be university educated, and then you go and work for a while before starting a family, and... yeah).

[identity profile] bleedtoblue.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 09:16 pm (UTC)(link)
I always assume I skew the results since I'm older than your average fan. My flist is fairly varied, but I haven't noticed an increase in babies on my flist. In RL I have, even though I tried to warn them!

[identity profile] misspamela.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 09:46 pm (UTC)(link)
I AM DONE HAVING CHILDREN.

They're behaving fine, why do you ask?
cofax7: climbing on an abbey wall  (Default)

[personal profile] cofax7 2009-12-11 09:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Seconded. I think it's just a function of how we interact that we're more aware of people having babies.
sentientcitizen: Rose Tyler throws her head back and laughs. (Ahhh! Human Contact!)

[personal profile] sentientcitizen 2009-12-11 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Should people not in relationships/just barely old enough to reproduce without societal shunning be bothering to take this poll, or would that just skew the results?

[identity profile] bitter-crimson.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)
I bet this also. Additionally, it's hard for me to gauge, b/c ten years ago, most of my fannish friends were my age (that is, in high school), and thus weren't really having many kids. Now I have a much wider range of ages in my fannish friends, in addition to being older myself.

[identity profile] elucreh.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
No intention of 'em, but fully intending to thoroughly love all the children of my friends as well as making kids my career; I made an exuberant post about a baby coming a month or so ago because I'm going to be a GODMOTHER for the first time! \o/
lapillus: (Default)

[personal profile] lapillus 2009-12-11 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
You see, I based my response on who I know who goes to cons who are having babies. I'm going to the same or fewer number of cons and the number of fans who are pregnant or not coming because they have a new little one in the last couple of years is much higher than I remember it being when I started in fandom.

[identity profile] sapote3.livejournal.com 2009-12-11 10:45 pm (UTC)(link)
I just present the information that I'm one year older than most of the Harry Potter girls, so that means that the oldest of them are in that spot around 22 - 23 when people who have kids right after college do their thing. Though absolutely none of the baby-having fans I know are in that age range at all.

For the record, there was also a huge baby boom in my town this year. Everywhere you went, everybody was pregnant.

Page 1 of 3