ext_1235 ([identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] thefourthvine 2006-08-24 11:54 pm (UTC)

OH MY GOD YOU'VE READ STAR BEAST EEEEEEEE! HI! I READ IT TOO! LUMMOX!

Okay. We needed to get that out of the way. I'm calmer now.

But, no. Heinlein was wrong about many things, but he was dead on about the meaning of lummox. What he didn't mention was that most people consider it to be a verging-on-archaic word (like oaf and cad, two other ones - and they are just tiny, so it's almost like not using a word at all - I like a lot that tend to get the "ahahaha what did you just say?" reaction). Now, my feeling is that we should use this word a lot more often and get it off the endangered list. (You should write a story! Called "Lummox"!) But most people appear to feel that it is best to let aged words die a natural death.

These people are obviously wrong. For the record.

*sullenly clings to her words*

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org