Keep Hoping Machine Running (
thefourthvine) wrote2007-02-21 01:26 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Poll: Compare Amongst Yourselves
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
So, first, let me just say: hey, it'd be cool if you'd take this poll. I would love you and stuff.
Second - when I say "your friends list," I mean the portion of your friends list that you read regularly - your default reading filter, if you have one, or the whole list if that's how you read. (If you don't read your friends list at all, this poll is not going to be a good fit for you.) My point is, I want you to consider the people you know the best. (Which is not to say you necessarily know them well, of course.) And when I say "the average," I mean your own personally assessed average of this trait over your friends list.
And, seriously, there are no bad answers here. I'm only wondering where you fit into your own mental picture of your friends list for these particular variables. I know you may not have great data for all these questions; just give me your first reaction, and I will of course love you forever.

ETA: Please don't go back to change your answers after you've finished the poll and seen the results! (Unless you think of something you want to add to the text box, or you've decided shoes are more important than almost-cock. Those questions are weighty and take long consideration; I understand that.)
[Poll #931955]
no subject
I think the "sexually active" question reflects whether or not people are partnered: I am partnered and you are partnered, so I assume we're having similar amounts of sex, whereas I assume that the single people on my flist are having little or no sex. Which is, of course, a pretty poor assumption to make.
The attractive thing is tricky. Veerrrrry tricky.
no subject
I am partnered and you are partnered, so I assume we're having similar amounts of sex, whereas I assume that the single people on my flist are having little or no sex. Which is, of course, a pretty poor assumption to make.
One of the odd things I've learned in the past few years - although mostly through RL as opposed to LJ - is that - well, okay. I also used to assume that that if you were partnered, you were having fairly regular, satisfying sex, unless there was a problem, like one of you had just had a baby or hip surgery or something. But then I found out that, no, actually a lot of my partnered friends (and especially, oddly enough, Best Beloved's partnered friends) are not having sex. I first discovered this because one of BB's friends expressed shock that we are still having sex. And said friend was herself partnered at the time, and had been for six years, and had not had sex for five of them.
BB and I were stunned by this revelation, but the friend didn't think it was really that strange.
But since then, more and more often, we've been getting the, "You're married and still having sex thing?" And part of that is that people expect lesbians not to have sex, but part of it is just - these days, lots of people in long-term relationships, whether gay or straight, seem not to have sex. (There was even a cover story in, I think, the New Yorker several years ago on just this topic.)
So, my long-winded point is: I don't assume that partnered means having sex anymore.
The attractive thing is tricky. Veerrrrry tricky.
I admit, I'm really curious about how that turns out, because I have a definite opinion on this even though I've hardly seen any of my friends list.
no subject
Like...when I was younger (in my early twenties), the assumption was that people who'd been married more than a few years were getting little or no sex, while we (who were single) were getting a lot of sex. :)
Nowadays I prefer to nap.