thefourthvine: Two people fucking, rearview: sex is the universal fandom. (Default)
Keep Hoping Machine Running ([personal profile] thefourthvine) wrote2010-01-21 06:31 pm
Entry tags:

Sex Really Is the Universal Fandom, Apparently

Best Beloved recently developed a desire to see a movie about a man with a disturbingly large moustache duking it out with a bald robot in a cowboy hat. Fortunately, there is a movie that meets this need. I was not judging this choice, but she still felt she had to defend it, and one point of her defense was that said movie was nominated for various awards.

This led, as was inevitable, to me browsing the IMDb for other nominees and winners of the Nebula for Best Script (given by your friends and mine, the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America). Which led me to discover that in 2000, the winner was The Sixth Sense, which beat out The Matrix, The Iron Giant, The Devil's Arithmetic, and a movie called Private Black Label 7: The Uranus Experiment 2.

Let me just repeat that: Private Black Label 7: The Uranus Experiment 2.

I read it out loud to Best Beloved, and she said, "Sounds like porn."

"It does," I said, "but why would they nominate porn for a screenwriting award?" (In my youth, I sat through several porn movies, and I tell you what: even if there had been a Nebula for Best Script That's at Least 50% "AAH!" and "OH GOD YES!" these movies still would not have won. Somewhere there is good porn, I'm guessing, but none of the guys I knew in high school or college knew about it.) So I checked. It is, in fact, porn. The plot keywords are Hardcore, Orgy, Second Part, Ejaculation, and Spaceship, which - wow, evocative. You can kind of see the story unfolding, can't you? In fact, I think I've read that story. Hmmm.

This obviously leaves me with a burning need to know what the hell is so special about Private Black Label 7: The Uranus Experiment 2. (Also I'm wondering how it got a Nebula nomination, and what exactly the voting process there was, but that, I figure, is a story for a different time. I am betting massive quantities of wank were involved - and, um, not just the kind you do by yourself.) Has anyone out there actually seen this cinematic masterpiece? (Ask your friends! And your parents! And your teachers!) Is it the kind of gripping, brilliant work Ursula Le Guin would have produced if she had ever been inspired to write hardcore spaceship orgy porn? (Ursula! Call me! I have a pitch for you!) What makes it so much better than parts 1 and 3, which were not nominated? (I mean, part 1 apparently had a sex scene filmed in NASA's vomit comet, which shows enormous dedication on the part of the actors and whoever put up the money, but that didn’t make it worthy of consideration.)

I just. I yearn to know. And yet I doubt Netflix carries this undoubtedly excellent title, and also, I really, really don't want to watch it. But someone somewhere must have!

Or, alternatively - somewhere out there, there must be a person who watches a lot of het porn. There is a recapping job just crying out to be done here, person!

[identity profile] azewewish.livejournal.com 2010-01-22 04:32 am (UTC)(link)
I feel like I really, really need this movie in my life now. There's got to be a drinking game that I can come up with while watching it.
ext_3450: readhead in a tophat. She looks vaguely like I might, were I young and pretty. (explicit content warning)

[identity profile] jenna-thorn.livejournal.com 2010-01-22 02:08 pm (UTC)(link)
I suspect we could come up with one right here in advance of your watching it.

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2010-01-23 08:11 pm (UTC)(link)
There probably is. In fact, I'm sure there is, but I'm worried you would die of alcohol poisoning from it.

WATCH IT. Obviously this is something the world needs!
stasia: (Default)

[personal profile] stasia 2010-01-22 04:48 am (UTC)(link)
The very strange thing about this is that WestWorld is on our Comcast On Demand and I'm watching it now!

*eep*

Stasia

ETA: Ah, it's not Westworld that's on the TV, it's Futureworld. Such a strange movie.
Edited 2010-01-22 05:09 (UTC)

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2010-01-23 08:20 pm (UTC)(link)
...Futureworld? I have not heard of this. Are there robots? Bald men? MOUSTACHES?

(Anonymous) 2010-01-23 08:56 pm (UTC)(link)
'Futureworld' is the sequel to Westworld, and actually makes Westworld look good.

And yes, robots. Mustaches. But not many bald men.

[identity profile] kailisu.livejournal.com 2010-01-23 08:58 pm (UTC)(link)
sorry - that was me (not that you know me). I hate it when I come in anonymously.
stasia: (Default)

[personal profile] stasia 2010-01-24 07:38 am (UTC)(link)
*snort*

There aren't enough moustaches (in fact, I don't remember any, which is what tipped me of to the fact that I was watching the sequel and not the first), and the only bald man (Yul Brynner, of course) wears a hat.

Here's the Futureworld Wiki entry, and the Futureworld imdb. Truly a ... erm, classic. Of a sort.

What came on after, Cherry 2000 was even better worse; terrible plot, bad, stiff acting, ridiculous dialogue and Melanie Griffiths, with that stupid little baby-voice. This one is more cult-film worthy, even with the stupid parts. It was so bad it was funny.

It's not porn-tastic, though, despite what the intro looked like. Which was sort of sad.

Stasia

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2010-01-24 07:59 am (UTC)(link)
How can there be a movie called Cherry 2000 that isn't porn? HOW? That doesn't make any SENSE. I am so confused.

That poster - wow. And I love how the Wikipedia article is all, DOES NOT CITE SOURCES. You go, Wikipedia! Hold the line! Make sure that all our information on exceedingly bad, decades-old science fiction movies is properly cited!

(no subject)

[personal profile] stasia - 2010-01-24 08:11 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] droolfangrrl.livejournal.com 2010-01-22 10:15 am (UTC)(link)
Sadly they don't have it. But you can see a picture of the cover here. http://www.cduniverse.com/productinfo.asp?pid=1596887&style=ice

"What was once science fiction becomes fact in Private's astonishingly ambitious new production THE URANUS EXPERIMENT. With an estimated budget of $750,000, Private captures on camera the very first orgasm in zero gravity! Lifting the XXX ... Full Descriptiongenre (and viewers) to historic new heights! Two spacecraft- one American, the other Russian are launched simultaneously. Both believe they are on a common mission: to dock and travel together through space. Their ultimate desination is the seventh planet from the sun, Uranus. With an entire galaxy as their laboratory, the largely female Russian team's secret mission is to learn how the absence of gravity affects human sexuality: male sperm production and female reaction. Before reaching Uranus, an explosive zero-gravity orgy launches bodies and love juices to float gracefully around the space capsule. The historic sex scenes were shot in a special aircraft, flying into an altitude of 35,000 feet, then diving quickly and turning upward again. Precisely the technique used in APOLLO 13. Zero gravity is achieved for about 25-30 seconds and is repeated a couple of times in order to capture all the adventurous action. "

[identity profile] womance.livejournal.com 2010-01-22 12:28 pm (UTC)(link)
explosive zero-gravity orgy.

love juices.

I must see this move. It sounds hilarious.

[identity profile] droolfangrrl.livejournal.com 2010-01-22 12:30 pm (UTC)(link)
It sounds rather untidy in an alarming way. I mean the first thing that phrase brings to mind is explosive decompression.

[identity profile] womance.livejournal.com 2010-01-22 12:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Not to mention the habit of fluids floating around in zero-g.

(no subject)

[identity profile] jenna-thorn.livejournal.com - 2010-01-22 14:10 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2010-01-23 08:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay, not that I am questioning the genius behind this project, but are there actually people who find the idea of gracefully floating "love juices" so erotic that they would look at an entire internet of porn and say, "YES. THAT IS WHAT I WANT TO SEE"?

In other news: awesome, yet awful!

[identity profile] st-crispins.livejournal.com 2010-01-22 12:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Bald robot cowboy

Westworld with Yul Brynner?

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2010-01-23 08:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Indeed!

[identity profile] droolfangrrl.livejournal.com 2010-01-22 02:36 pm (UTC)(link)
http://www.space.com/sciencefiction/movies/uranus_experiment_000516.html

"Protest, joke or achievement?

Despite the technological innovations involved in the series, some high-ranking members of the SFWA were not amused by the Nebula nomination.

"The Uranus Experiment Part Two was placed on the Nebula ballot by a bloc of writers who were (1) protesting the fact that the SFWA members voted to re-institute the Dramatic Nebula award, and (2) thought it would be 'fun' to put a hardcore porn film on the ballot," said Ann C. Crispin, SFWA vice president.

"Not my idea of a joke, but perhaps I'm humor-impaired."

Crispin added that the SFWA "is not happy" about the choice, but "we're not in the business of censoring our members' choices."

She did not expect the film to win the award.

The other films nominated for the Nebula are The Matrix, The Sixth Sense, The Iron Giant and Showtime original The Devil's Arithmetic. "

and the whole zero g sex thing, is something apparently a lot of people have given serious thought to

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/1042/has-anyone-ever-had-sex-in-space
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_in_space

[identity profile] greenygal.livejournal.com 2010-01-22 02:49 pm (UTC)(link)
And, of course, TV Tropes has a page for everything (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ZeroGSpot).

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2010-01-23 08:28 pm (UTC)(link)
AWESOME. I knew wank had to be involved somewhere! If only they had named names. Probably Will Shetterly was involved. (Perhaps he felt it was classist to exclude porn from consideration?) Sadly, fandom_wank was not around then, so we'll never know all the details.

[identity profile] boogieshoes.livejournal.com 2010-01-22 03:00 pm (UTC)(link)
is it bad that i'm reading these comments and coming up with porn titles to watch with a future boyfriend? because you know if it's bad, you *must* share the pain!

-bs

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2010-01-23 08:33 pm (UTC)(link)
I believe that is evidence that you are a good and worthy person! Also, this is an excellent way of making sure a guy is truly boyfriend-worthy material, because would you want to spend time with a person who wouldn't see the joy in The Uranus Experiment 2? No. No, you would not.

[identity profile] denynothing1.livejournal.com 2010-01-22 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)
What makes this post even funnier is that when I scrolled past it on my flist the number of comments was 69.

Well, it's funny if you're channeling your inner Beavis & Butthead today. Which apparently I am.

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2010-01-23 08:34 pm (UTC)(link)
AWESOME. Allow me to channel my inner Keanu: "69, dudes!"

[identity profile] threerings.livejournal.com 2010-01-23 04:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Now I'm trying to decide if using my mother's internet connection to DL this is a good or a bad idea.

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2010-01-23 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Clearly, it is the BEST idea.

Page 2 of 2