thefourthvine: Two people fucking, rearview: sex is the universal fandom. (Default)
Keep Hoping Machine Running ([personal profile] thefourthvine) wrote2006-01-18 02:31 pm
Entry tags:

Rant: Is There a DSM-IV Category for Fan Fiction Induced Insanity?

I haven't been sleeping much lately. This means I've reading a lot of FF. (Yes, even more than usual. But, on the bright side, not quite enough to qualify me for an intervention at the Fan Mental Health Clinic.) Which means that it's time for another damn rant. (If you're new here: in rants, the cut tag indicates mean-spiritedness and general pedantry. Click at your own risk.)

I swear that I will get back to recommending actual FF very, very soon. And it will be even sooner if we could all attend to a few small matters before I lose my mind.



Sentients only, please. Or, to put it another way: could we please stop granting quite so much volition to individual body parts? By which I mean - if you're writing something, like for example a sex scene, and character A shoves his tongue into character B's mouth, please don't write as though the tongue just crawled in there on its own. If you write, "his tongue reached for hers," I'm expecting tentacle porn, okay? I'm expecting Alien-based horror tentacle porn, as, like, the tongue spears into her mouth, implants her with eggs, and then rips her brain out. I'm not thinking, "Aw, they're kissing. How sweet." I am writhing in anticipation of looming terror. And, yes, fear does lead to arousal blah blah blah, but alien implantation scenes in the middle of smut lead to insanity. Attribute the action to the person performing it. At least most of the time. I'm begging you.

Zombies need brains! I, on the other hand, think I'm seeing too many of them. Or rather, I'm seeing too much of the phrase "sucking his brains out through his cock." I mean, yes, I get it. I got the last few thousand times someone used this phrase in FF. And it's starting to sound...well, creepy. Eerie. Like a really mutant zombie-related fetish, basically. I'll be reading along in a sex scene, and this phrase will occur, and I have this moment of nervous tension, wondering if the character giving the blowjob is really a secret zombie. (Worse, I sometimes also consider the physics of this, which is the kind of thought that can put a person off sex for life.) So, you know, it's a fine phrase. But could we give it a rest, please? Let it lie fallow for a bit? Or maybe we could implement some kind of rationing system. You know, a quota. On Mondays, people whose names begin with A-E can use it, and on Tuesdays F-J, and so on. On Sundays we all get a day of rest from the phrase. What blissful Sundays those would be.

You do not drop kisses. Go ahead, try it. You will find your lips remain firmly attached to your face no matter how hard you try to drop them on someone else. Or if they don't, you might want to see a doctor. You may be a zombie. (If so, try to get your fix the normal way. Gnawing on people's skulls was enough for zombies when I was young, and there's no need to get all fancy with it now. Sucking brains out through cocks is just not on, people. You may be undead, but you can still have class.)

Oh my god no more essence ever I mean it. If come is the essence of a man, he's not worth thinking about, let alone writing about. And if someone is touching someone else's essence, you'd better be writing Descartes/Schopenhauer and not just some random buttsex.

You need lips to kiss. So, take cocks, for example. They do not have lips and thus should not kiss each other. You would not write a story in which cocks hold hands and go on a picnic and declare love for each other and maybe whisper sweet nothings in each other's ears. The kissing cock is just the PG-13 version of that story, people. (Or potentially a quaint and curious pub name soon to appear on the cover of a Martha Grimes novel. Unless somebody stops her while there's still time. Not that I am suggesting anything, mind you.)

Forget the lies your health teacher told you. High-gauge painkillers are not instantaneously addictive. Seriously. I have taken them, and I am not a twitching addict. And going off them was not so much "hideous withdrawal" as "Hey! I can blink again!" See, if you’re taking them for actual, you know, pain, they aren’t very addictive at all. (Physical dependence does happen when you take them for a while. Which is why you taper off. Tapering off? Does not suck if you do it right.) If you’ve had, say, massive surgery to repair massive injuries and you’re on a massive pain-relief regimen as a result, yes, you will want those drugs if they’re taken away from you. But not because you’ve become addicted to them. You’ll want them because without them you’ll be in pain.

I know that seems kind of obvious. I thought so, too. But I’ve seen this more and more often in FF: a character takes - well, let’s go whole-hog and say oxycodone, the ingredient in that famously addictive drug, OxyContin. (Although even then, you take it differently for a high than for pain. Just, you know, FYI.) Takes it because, you know, he’s had his face ripped off or something (and that’s a made-up example; I’ve never read a story in which it happened, so if you’ve written one, I’m not picking on you). And he's on it for four days, and then the doctor starts "weaning" him off it, and he suffers the agonies of withdrawal. Well, OK. Withdrawal sucks, no doubt. But that character shouldn’t be going through it; he should be suffering the agonies of plain old agony, of being undermedicated by a supposed professional after having his face ripped off by the Clawbeast of the Betelgeusian Rainforest. (Or whatever.) Please, people, please - let’s keep our sick bay stories and our addiction stories separate, OK? There’s plenty of medically realistic suffering you can inflict. Without making every fan on the planet terrified of taking medication for pain.

What happens in the past stays in the past. Likewise with the future and the present. Pick a tense. Any tense. And then fucking stay with it. I don't care if you write your fan fiction in Past Inverted Pluperfect Imperative (actually, I would very likely erect a shrine in your honor), as long as you stay in Past Inverted Pluperfect Imperative. And if just one tense per story is too confining for you, at least limit yourself to one tense per section. And oh my god please one tense per sentence. "Was" and "is" are cousins, but they should not hang out together; their families do not get along. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.

Appropriate terminology. I don't want to be difficult. But is it so very challenging to consider what phrases your point-of-view character might reasonably use in, for example, a sexual setting? I mean, okay. Benton Fraser might use just about any word, including the Inuktuk word for "icicle," to describe his cock. With Fraser, I'm prepared to accept any term up to "Winky the Wonder Horse," and I'm betting some of you could make me happy with that, even. But if you've got a modern-day American military man using the phrase "manly rod," I am going to need, minimum, 2,000 words of backstory that explains how Jack O'Neill, in addition to the rest of his traumatic past, was at some point locked in a basement for three years with nothing to read but old romance novels.1

NO MORE CUTSEY PAIRING NAMES EVER I MEAN IT SO HELP ME GOD. And, yes, capslock is a crime against the internet, but sometimes it is impossible to convey the proper level of emphasis any other way. This is one of those times. I blame the more insane Harry/Hermione folks for this one. (...And, damn, I've forgotten the pairing name again. Hermeneutics? Harmonica? Help me out here, people.) But we all share the shame now, as the disease has spread to fandoms that should be innocent of any such taint. And, see, fine. If you really need to run the names of your pairing together (Although, seriously - why? It doesn't prove they were OMG meant to be together, you know. What message are you trying to convey? Theirloveissonominal?), then go right ahead. I may judge you - tough to avoid it these days, what with all the pairing name insanity going around - but I'll keep it to myself. It is your privilege to come up with mutant pairing names if you want to. It is your right.

But please, please, please, for the love of all that is holy, at least keep it relatively clear what the pairing actually is. If you tell me that you love Vecchowalski, at least I have a reasonable guess about what that might be. But if you tell me that you love Rayre, or Hooray, or Ski-Ho, that could be anything. And if you decide that Vecchio/Kowalski is now called Chicago, that is even worse. It conveys no useful information at all. (Well, okay. Some. I mean, I'd be thinking in terms of the right fandom; there are pairing names that don't even have that going for them.) Please. Please. It is wrong to make every story header an interminable guessing game. ("...Is the pairing bigger than a bread box?") You won't like it when I'm batshit insane and armed, people, and I'm getting there.

-Footnote-

1 Daniel's eyebrows shot up, and Jack mentally rewound the conversation. Shit.

"Jack," Daniel said cautiously, "did you just say 'pistoning love-muscle'?"

"No," Jack said firmly.

"Oooo-kay." There was an uncomfortable pause, and then Daniel said, very casually, "So. I'm going to get Sam and Teal'c and Janet now. You just...sit there."

"Daniel, sit down."

"I would, but now I'm not sure if I'm eating lunch with Jack O'Neill or the Goa'uld who was responsible for Barbara Cartland's incredible and disturbing productivity."

"Sit down, Daniel. And don't knock Barbara Cartland."

Daniel didn't move, but his eyebrows attempted to scurry off his face and go find Sam and Teal'c on their own.

Jack sighed. "Okay. See, when I was 26, I was on this mission..."

[identity profile] theamusedone.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 02:37 pm (UTC)(link)
This amused the hell out of me, thank you so much!

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 03:09 pm (UTC)(link)
I have amused the One Who Is Amused. YAY!

(no subject)

[identity profile] darthfox.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 16:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] reginagiraffe - 2006-01-18 16:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] darthfox.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 17:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] executrix.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 18:21 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] tex.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 02:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I can't disagree with any one of these complaints (suggestions? Advisories?)

But the second one - let me just say, Yeah. But "coming harder than he ever has" - I still like that one. Coming is good. But you're right - having a really important part of the body pulled forcibly out of the "manly rod" - that's just not cool.

And as for Fraser - I am of the belief that Fraser uses the word "cock". Ray uses "cock" and "dick". Just my little ole opinion.

[identity profile] bethbethbeth.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 02:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Fraser thinks "cock," but he *says* "penis." *g*

(no subject)

[identity profile] tex.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 14:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] tex.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 15:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] estrella30.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 15:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] tex.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 15:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] isiscolo.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 15:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] tex.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 15:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] executrix.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 18:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] china_shop - 2006-01-18 22:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] indywind - 2006-01-19 08:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] pearl-o.livejournal.com - 2006-01-27 11:04 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] brooklinegirl.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 02:40 pm (UTC)(link)
With Fraser, I'm prepared to accept any term up to "Winky the Wonder Horse," and I'm betting some of you could make me happy with that, even.

...okay, now I want someone to write that in a compelling manner. Damn, I wish [livejournal.com profile] lynnmonster was still writing DS.

And if you decide that Vecchio/Kowalski is now called Chicago, that is even worse. It conveys no useful information at all. (Well, okay. Some. I mean, I'd be thinking in terms of the right fandom;

oh god. I'm sorry, and I'm SO RIGHT THERE WITH YOU on cutesy pairing names, 100%, so really, it's pretty much your fault that somewhere in the back of my brain, I'm going to be thinking of Vecchio/Kowalski as "Chicago" from now on.

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 03:22 pm (UTC)(link)
...okay, now I want someone to write that in a compelling manner. Damn, I wish [livejournal.com profile] lynnmonster was still writing DS.

I KNOW. It is so unfair, because she's the person who immediately leaps to mind for that task. Hmmm. Perhaps you should post a challenge in your journal. It could be one of the Three Tasks to Appoint a Successor to the dS Crackthrone! (Crackthrone. OMG. Worst made-up word ever; feathercock is nothing to it.)

I'm sorry, and I'm SO RIGHT THERE WITH YOU on cutesy pairing names, 100%, so really, it's pretty much your fault that somewhere in the back of my brain, I'm going to be thinking of Vecchio/Kowalski as "Chicago" from now on.

I think this is pretty much where I defriend and ban you and then set up a community called we_hate_blg, isn't it?

But, alas, I cannot. For one thing, I could not stand to live without your cooking adventures, which make my kitchen failures (like the seriously mealy new potato recipe I tried last night) seem, um, really really good in comparison. (The kale and cannellini soup was excellent, though, and easy enough that you could make it!)

(no subject)

[identity profile] lynnmonster.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 15:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] lynnmonster.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 19:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] china_shop - 2006-01-18 22:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] nightengale.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 23:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] reginagiraffe - 2006-01-18 16:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] flambeau.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 01:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] m-butterfly.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 03:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] mmeguilotn.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 14:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] reginagiraffe - 2006-01-19 18:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] m-butterfly.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 03:44 (UTC) - Expand
vass: Small turtle with green leaf in its mouth (Fabulous Waluigi)

[personal profile] vass 2006-01-18 02:40 pm (UTC)(link)
you'd better be writing Descartes/Schopenhauer

Oh, *would* you? *dreamy sigh*

I would consider reciprocating with Wagner/Nietzsche.

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 03:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh my GOD. I would LOVE YOU FOREVER if you wrote Wagner/Nietzsche. I mean, yes yes yes.

*begins plotting Descartes/Schopenhauer*

(no subject)

[identity profile] bekijane.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 15:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] vass - 2006-01-19 00:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] laylah.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 15:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] vass - 2006-01-19 00:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] sinsense.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 15:38 (UTC) - Expand
brynwulf: (Lips R Lips)

[personal profile] brynwulf 2006-01-18 02:40 pm (UTC)(link)
ROFLAMO!! I swear I used something along the lines of "sucking coherent thought out through his cock" in Highlander ten years ago. I figured it would have grown up and moved out by now.

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 03:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Hmmm. I think I love you anyway. I mean, the coherent thought line is good. So I guess I can't blame you for inspiring, you know, a slightly shortened version that just happens to be infused with essence o' zombie.

I do wish I could find someone to blame, though. That is the first step in healing, isn't it?

(no subject)

[personal profile] brynwulf - 2006-01-18 16:39 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] callmesandy.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 02:40 pm (UTC)(link)
HP fandom isn't even close to blame for portmanteau pairing names. Last time someone tried to track it, possible culprits included american soap opera fandom, buffy fandom and maybe even popslash.

And we should figure that one out and HURT them for it, of course.
missizzy: (Classic)

[personal profile] missizzy 2006-01-18 03:27 pm (UTC)(link)
First place I saw them was in Digimon. There it *might* have been an attempt to subconsciously lead people towards at least remembering the original Japanese names, since they used them, but I'm probably giving the young members of said fandom too much credit.
Thought I think it would be possible to use essence for a Force-ghost. Though you'd still need to be a pretty good writer to make it work.

(no subject)

[identity profile] claire.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 15:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] overly-shy.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 16:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] callmesandy.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 16:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] callmesandy.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 18:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] dine.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 20:15 (UTC) - Expand

Blame Roswell

[identity profile] mecurtin.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 18:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] out-there.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 21:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] macey-muse.livejournal.com - 2006-12-02 11:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] m-butterfly.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 03:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] sangerin.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 23:35 (UTC) - Expand
birdsflying: (sga john)

[personal profile] birdsflying 2006-01-18 02:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Word!

And uh, can I add a suggestion? For the love of little fishes, people - research lube! No every oily substance is a good one, you know? Some of them contain things that I wouldn't want on my hands for five minutes, let alone inside/on delicate parts. (I may have been mentally scarred by two fics this morning, one after another, which involved...inappropriate imo substances. And I read them before 9am which didn't help matters either)

"I would, but now I'm not sure if I'm eating lunch with Jack O'Neill or the Goa'uld who was responsible for Barbara Cartland's incredible and disturbing productivity." - ahahahahahaha. :snerk:

(argh, lj is being a right little bugger today, appologies if this double-posts)

(no subject)

[personal profile] birdsflying - 2006-01-18 14:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] azurelunatic - 2006-01-18 14:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] birdsflying - 2006-01-18 15:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] azurelunatic - 2006-01-18 15:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] birdsflying - 2006-01-18 16:14 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] bethbethbeth.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 02:45 pm (UTC)(link)
LOL! I laughed and laughed and laughed.

(okay, I took a break from laughing to worry about whether I'd committed any of these hideous offenses, but then I went right back to laughing)

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 03:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you!

okay, I took a break from laughing to worry about whether I'd committed any of these hideous offenses, but then I went right back to laughing

I'm pretty sure you haven't. I mean, I hate these things, and I love your stories, so it stands to reason, yes? But even if you have, I grant you TFV's Absolution. (It isn't actually, you know, good for anything, but you can frame it and put it on your wall to cover a stain or something.) You are hereby absolved of any previous fan fiction sins you have committed. Go, and sin no more.

[identity profile] minnow1212.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 02:49 pm (UTC)(link)
>"I would, but now I'm not sure if I'm eating lunch with Jack O'Neill or the Goa'uld who was responsible for Barbara Cartland's incredible and disturbing productivity."<

hee! (Well, something had to explain it.)

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 03:59 pm (UTC)(link)
(Well, something had to explain it.)

God, I know. And since no human could write that much, we're pretty much left with aliens, the supernatural, and the devil as potential explanations.

(no subject)

[personal profile] rydra_wong - 2006-01-19 02:00 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] datta.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 02:55 pm (UTC)(link)
This is lovely and very well-thought-out but the best bit is Jack and Daniel. Because they are the best bit of EVERYTHING.

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 04:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you! (And, yes. Jack and Daniel are loads of fun to write. I think my semific up there mostly came from me staring at Daniel's eyebrows in flat astonishment during a recent bout of SG1 vid watching. I found myself developing very worrying theories about those eyebrows.)

[identity profile] cranberryink.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 02:55 pm (UTC)(link)
And if someone is touching someone else's essence, you'd better be writing Descartes/Schopenhauer and not just some random buttsex.

Oh, you made me laugh and laugh and laugh. ♥

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 04:11 pm (UTC)(link)
*hopeful look*

Do you feel a sudden urge to create a Descartes/Schopenhauer mood theme now? Although, wow, it'd be tough to come up with anything for "happy" in that one.

[identity profile] penknife.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 02:57 pm (UTC)(link)
The pairing names make me twitch. I keep waiting for "Magnavier" or "Xavneto" -- I will take it as a sign of the Apocalypse. (And I can't even imagine what you'd get if you were trying to be cutesy. My brain simply will not produce the equivalent of "Wolfstar" or "Pumpkin Pie" for Xavier/Magneto.)
wychwood: chess queen against a runestone (Fan - oldfashioned)

[personal profile] wychwood 2006-01-18 03:06 pm (UTC)(link)
"Magnavier" or "Xavneto"

*cringes*

I am occasionally (but only occasionally!) guilty of using smushes. But not for Xavier and Magneto! Worlds of no! As for cutesy pairing names... No. Really, really, really no.

(How about "DeathNDestruction"? *g*)

(no subject)

[personal profile] azurelunatic - 2006-01-18 15:26 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] wychwood - 2006-01-18 15:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] penknife.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 14:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] mmeguilotn.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 14:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] penknife.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 14:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2006-01-21 18:07 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] kalimyre.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 02:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Dude, I do believe I love your rants even more than the recs. And that last scene between Jack and Daniel? Made me very nearly inhale my jolly rancher. The eyebrows tried to scurry away. I mean, my god, have you no respect for people who are reading and may be trying to breathe and eat at the same time? Must I remove all beverages and potentially edible items from reach before reading one of your rants?

Because I would totally do that.

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 04:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Dude, I do believe I love your rants even more than the recs.

Thank you.

The eyebrows tried to scurry away.

I'm surprised that eyebrowfic is not a thriving subgenre in SG1. I've only seen the vids, but even in those, Daniel's eyebrows sort of seem to be the fifth team member. They have a lot of personality.

I mean, my god, have you no respect for people who are reading and may be trying to breathe and eat at the same time?

Oodles of respect! Really! Oxygen-breathers are welcome in this journal!

Hmmm. Perhaps I should start trying to tell jokes in this space. You know how there are natural joke tellers? I am not one of those people. When I tell jokes, even really good ones, it takes ten times as long as it should, and no one notices when the punchline happens; by that time, they've usually acquired this blank, jaded expression, sort of like people watching theater of the absurd. (Best Beloved tends to start laughing somewhere in the middle of my jokes, though. Apparently I'm so obviously bad at telling jokes that the ineptitude itself is amusing.)

(no subject)

[identity profile] executrix.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 18:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] kalimyre.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 20:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] nightengale.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 23:25 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] jacquez.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 02:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Sentients only, please

Reminds me entirely too much of the zombie hand of Rob Lowe, only that was WORSE because it wasn't even "his hand", it was stuff like "a hand" and "the hand". WHY THE HELL DO PEOPLE DO THIS???

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 04:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, lord, yes. I'd actually forgotten about the trauma of reading stories in which "a hand" and "the cock" have starring roles. I was happy suppressing those memories, dammit. Happier, anyway.

WHY THE HELL DO PEOPLE DO THIS???

My theories are:
  1. They genuinely find detached body parts erotic.

  2. They get tired of starting sentences with "Jim," but Jim is doing all the action. So they start writing about Jim's left hand or his eyebrow or his tongue. Pretty soon they're writing alien parts sex and they don't even know it; they're just victims of sentence monotony.

  3. They're rogue health teachers. My health teachers, at any rate, obviously wanted a world in which no one ever had sex. Well, zombie hands and tentacle tongues are probably way more effective than bad movies that try to explain the dangers of having sex without a condom without ever using the words "sex" and "condom."

(no subject)

[identity profile] out-there.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 21:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] jacquez.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 04:50 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] wliberation.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 03:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, I have to admit, I disagree a bit on number one because I happen to be a huge fan of well-used personification, but the thing is, I suppose, that it is not always well-used, especially in sex scenes. But oh, so agree on the rest. Especially on the question of 'essence'; dear god, what are people thinking when they write that?

Right there on the list of should NEVER be used, next to 'kissing cocks', should definitely be 'battling cocks'. It always makes me want to shout, "En garde!"

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 05:00 pm (UTC)(link)
I disagree a bit on number one because I happen to be a huge fan of well-used personification, but the thing is, I suppose, that it is not always well-used, especially in sex scenes.

See, precisely. I'm also fond of well-used anthropomorphizing, but it's one of those techniques that's hard to use properly and disastrous when misused. (Unlike, for example, haiku. It's hard to write a real haiku and remarkably easy to write a not-really-a-haiku, but even the not-really ones can be fun.) And it's extremely easy to overuse it.

Especially on the question of 'essence'; dear god, what are people thinking when they write that?

I'm actually fairly glad I don't know. You know how it is when you look into an abyss.

Right there on the list of should NEVER be used, next to 'kissing cocks', should definitely be 'battling cocks'. It always makes me want to shout, "En garde!"

Oh, god, yes. (For me, it always suggests that "Dueling Cocks" is the natural sequel to "Dueling Banjos," but I can get to the "en garde" place, too.) We can file that one with "raping her mouth with his tongue." *shudders*

(no subject)

[identity profile] wliberation.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 06:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] mecurtin.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 19:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] sibility.livejournal.com - 2006-01-25 12:58 (UTC) - Expand
wychwood: Babylon 5's Declaration of Principles (B5 - Declaration of Principles)

[personal profile] wychwood 2006-01-18 03:02 pm (UTC)(link)
*laughs self almost sick*

Go you! You should be the Mighty Dictator of Fandom. Maybe. It would be dead good.

It is wrong to make every story header an interminable guessing game. ("...Is the pairing bigger than a bread box?")

*snickers*

I adore your mini-ficlet there. Especially Daniel's eyebrows. I remember reading a story in which it turned out that Rodney had read loads of romance novels, because "Amazon didn't deliver to Siberia", there were a stack of them left behind, and there's precious little else to do there. But I don't think even he felt the need to use those sorts of terms *g*

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 05:22 pm (UTC)(link)
You should be the Mighty Dictator of Fandom.

Yes! I would run on a platform of porn and proper punctuation.

*practices evil laugh*

I remember reading a story in which it turned out that Rodney had read loads of romance novels, because "Amazon didn't deliver to Siberia", there were a stack of them left behind, and there's precious little else to do there. But I don't think even he felt the need to use those sorts of terms

Oh, wow. Do you remember who wrote it? Because I haven't read that, and I would love to.

And Rodney - see, Rodney's too blunt. Sure, he talks a lot, but I just don't see him using fifteen syllables when one would do. Plus, you know, he's not much for social niceties, so - yeah, I think he's pretty much a "cock" kind of guy.

Hmmm. That last sentence sounded wrong and yet oh so right.

(no subject)

[personal profile] wychwood - 2006-01-26 13:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] ficgate.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 12:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] wychwood - 2006-01-19 12:26 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] thisisbone.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 03:03 pm (UTC)(link)
I have to say I'm usually pretty anti-name scrunching, but I do like the play on words of "Wincest" to denote "incest featuring the Winchester brothers."

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 06:07 pm (UTC)(link)
*eyes you*

See, okay. On the one hand, "Wincest" gets the central concept - which, for me, is definitely the incest, as I have this tragic, unbreakable squick that is preventing me from reading authors I love - right there in the header. This is a good thing, especially in a fandom which doesn't always bother to warn for incest. (Because it's the whole fandom, yup, I know.) On the other hand, it's a lot like "twincest," which is HP's name for Fred/George. I get them confused when I'm skimming fic headers.

Of course, they're both incest, so it doesn't matter if I get them confused. And it is very informative; it isn't a pairing portmanteau so much as it's a pairing/warning portmanteau. Hmmm. Okay. I say we let "Wincest" pass, and focus our attention on the real evil: pairing names that have no relationship to the character names at all.

(no subject)

[identity profile] thisisbone.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 18:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] thisisbone.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 15:36 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/oceana_/ 2006-01-18 03:09 pm (UTC)(link)
NO MORE CUTSEY PAIRING NAMES EVER I MEAN IT SO HELP ME GOD.

Can we start a petition for this, please? I mean, I left Buffy fandom before they started with the Spangel, Spander, Spuffy etc. and SG is wonderfully free of disturbing name mix-ups, but NCIS? Oh, the horror! Tate, Tabby, Kibbs... it HURTS MY BRAIN! Who came up with these things anyway? Is this some grand fanfic tradition that I managed to miss the first years in fandom, and if it is, where did it start? Did they call Kirk/Spock Spork back in the day?

Anyway, if you need arms to prevent you from going insane, drop me note. I'll ask Jack for a P-90. ;-)

[identity profile] ladysunflow.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 03:39 pm (UTC)(link)
SGA has 'Sparky'. It took me a month to decipher what the hell people were talking about.

(no subject)

[identity profile] m-butterfly.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 03:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] noneeca.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 10:52 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] hebe-stjames.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 03:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Would it be okay to use the word essence if you were writing Dr. Strangelove smut? (I haven't done so, but now I really want to.)

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 06:16 pm (UTC)(link)
YES YES YES YES. And you so totally should write that immediately.

[identity profile] miriam-heddy.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 03:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Because of you, my 2 year old daughter kept asking me, "What's so funny?"

And I really could not even begin to explain.

And I can't find it in me to argue with any of it.

Did you, by the way, watch the "Golden Globes" and see Hugh Laurie get perturbed as he accidentally ended a thank you sentence with a preposition? Fandom could learn something from this man.

I keep thinking back to my early fannish days and whether I ever would have read slash if the pairing had been written "Kock."

[identity profile] commodorified.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 03:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Did you, by the way, watch the "Golden Globes" and see Hugh Laurie get perturbed as he accidentally ended a thank you sentence with a preposition? Fandom could learn something from this man.

Dear God.

Fandom should send gold and booze to this man.


(no subject)

[identity profile] mmeguilotn.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 14:25 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] estrella30.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 03:17 pm (UTC)(link)
see, I was so strictly in DS for so long that I never even HEARD of pairing names till SV. and now, god, one day I tried to do it talking about clark and lois and said CHLOIS, which is apparently *chloe/lois?* and I nearly started an issue.

HI. SORRY BUT FANDOM ISNT SUPPOSED TO BE THIS HARD THANKS.

[identity profile] brooklinegirl.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 03:23 pm (UTC)(link)
HI. SORRY BUT FANDOM ISNT SUPPOSED TO BE THIS HARD THANKS.

*koff* Well, if you'd choose your fandoms with slightly more care...

[identity profile] nightchik.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 03:19 pm (UTC)(link)
And if you decide that Vecchio/Kowalski is now called Chicago, that is even worse.

I didn't even know you could do that!

I have work to do.

[identity profile] nightchik.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 03:22 pm (UTC)(link)
*points to the pranksters*

(no subject)

[identity profile] nightchik.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 18:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] jacquez.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 04:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] nightchik.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 05:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] mmeguilotn.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 14:28 (UTC) - Expand
ext_2451: (Default)

[identity profile] aukestrel.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 03:24 pm (UTC)(link)
I didn't think you could cutesy the dS pairings but OMG you are terrifying! You DID!

AUGH!

*runs and hides in corner*

Well, at least M7 is safe: Chin? Vis? I don't THINK so. HEH HEH.

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 06:54 pm (UTC)(link)
I didn't think you could cutesy the dS pairings but OMG you are terrifying! You DID!

I know. Isn't it wonderful? When I was writing this, I thought, I need to use an example from dS; it's the only fandom I'm pretty sure doesn't have any portmanteaus or weird pairing names. (Because we are so very classy in dS. Also, our Mountie would die of shame if did anything of the kind.) And then I thought, hmmm, bound to be challenging. But it turned out it totally wasn't!

*is proud beyond all measure*

Well, at least M7 is safe: Chin? Vis? I don't THINK so. HEH HEH.

Hey, that isn't fair. You have to give me the full names of the characters, plus some description of what they're like. Even if their names are too short for a portmanteau, there's always room for a completely stupid pairing name.

(no subject)

[identity profile] aukestrel.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 19:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] greenygal.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 19:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] aukestrel.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 05:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] greenygal.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 05:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] lorem_ipsum - 2006-01-19 19:16 (UTC) - Expand
ext_1611: Isis statue (Default)

[identity profile] isiscolo.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 03:25 pm (UTC)(link)
But please, please, please, for the love of all that is holy, at least keep it relatively clear what the pairing actually is.

If I never again hear "Sparky" in the SGA fandom, it will be too soon.
wychwood: Sheppard saying "Did I do that?" (SGA - Shep Did I do that?)

[personal profile] wychwood 2006-01-18 03:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, the people responsible (mostly in jest) for starting that are attempting to change the pairing name to "Jizabeth" at the moment *g* So you never know!

(no subject)

[identity profile] dzurlady.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 00:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] tex.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 15:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] seperis.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 16:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] cetpar.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 17:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] isiscolo.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 17:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] isiscolo.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 19:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] nightengale.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 23:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] nightengale.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 17:34 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] danibennett.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 11:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] nightengale.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 17:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] jocondite.livejournal.com - 2006-01-21 02:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] rydra_wong - 2006-01-19 02:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] m-butterfly.livejournal.com - 2006-01-19 03:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2006-01-20 13:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] m-butterfly.livejournal.com - 2006-01-20 22:55 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] sciurida.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 03:27 pm (UTC)(link)
OMG. I have images in my head now of two cocks holding hands on a picnic now. Eh, yes.

This rant was brilliant and clever and gah, funny! I so agree on the pairing names, some of them are so very strange and confusing. I am a big fan of knowing the pairing(s) before I read and the "cute" names are not helping me at all.

("...Is the pairing bigger than a bread box?")

Hah! Brilliant!

[identity profile] thefourthvine.livejournal.com 2006-01-18 07:05 pm (UTC)(link)
OMG. I have images in my head now of two cocks holding hands on a picnic now. Eh, yes.

That sounds, um, fairly scary. Especially since cocks do not normally have hands, so actually you're seeing mutated cocks on a picnic. Eeep.

Hah! Brilliant!

Thank you!

(no subject)

[identity profile] sciurida.livejournal.com - 2006-01-18 19:22 (UTC) - Expand

Page 1 of 5